
From Minister to Carer: Victor Dominello’s Most Personal Challenge
When former NSW Minister Victor Dominello helped build Service NSW, he made government simpler for millions. But when his mum was diagnosed with dementia, he discovered just how broken the system still is.
In this powerful conversation, Victor shares the reality of being a son and brother in the thick of caring, the toll it’s taken on his family, and his vision for a future where bureaucracy doesn’t break us—but actually carries us. It’s personal, it’s political, and it’s a glimpse at what “Government 3.0” could mean for every family.
FIND OUT MORE
If you’re caring for aging parents, navigating your own next chapter, or just trying to keep all the balls in the air—you’re not alone. At Violet, we offer free tools and support to help families navigate the last stage of life with care and confidence. Visit violet.org.au to start the conversation.
CREDITS
Host: Melissa Reader
Guest: Victor Dominello
Executive & Audio Producer: Madeline Joannou - Mylk Media
Find out more about Violet at violet.org.au
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Foreign.
Hello, I'm Melissa Rida. Welcome to Age Hood. It's the podcast for people who are quietly carrying it all. Aging parents, kids, work, life and their own next chapter. If this sounds like you, well, you're in your Age Hood and it's time we talked about it. Today I'm joined by Victor Dominello. You may know Victor as a former Minister for Digital Innovation here in the New South Wales government. He was the architect of Service New South Wales and someone who has really championed how technology can make life a little simpler. But recently, Victor shared something that is much more personal his family's journey. Caring for his mum, who is living with dementia. In this conversation, Victor opens up about what that experience has been like as a son and a brother, and why it has really convinced him that our systems need to change. Dementia is now the leading cause of death in Australia and it has been the leading cause of death for women for some time. Yet families still face this fragmented set of bureaucratic processes when what they really need most is dignity, some clarity, support and some compassion. Victor calls this moment an opportunity not to criticise, but to start to look forward and design a system that actually carries families rather than weighing them down. Today, we explore what his vision is like for for what he calls Government 3.0 and what it could mean for every one of us. Sad min is the unexpected burden of endless bureaucracy during times of deep grief. Wills are important, but they don't give critical information like passwords, bank accounts and bills. For that, you need a letter of wishes from today's sponsor, BillWill. Go to billwill.com au for a simple and secure way to reduce stress for your loved ones and share your values and preserve your voice. Victor, thank you for being here. Really nice to have you here. I've been looking forward to our chat. Likewise, you spent over 15 years in the New South Wales Parliament, if I've got it correct, firstly as Minister for Innovation and then Minister for Digital and Customer Service. And I know that when most people think about your time in office, they think of Service New South Wales, that transformational piece that made government simpler and a little bit more human for many people. So, you know, turning those long cues and those forms that we all remember into something that people often talk about as simple and a lot more dignified. Perhaps, you know, the one part of government that is a whole lot easier to work with. And Covid also showed us how critical that transformation was. When you look back on your time in the Ministry and in Parliament, what do you think Made that transformation really resonate. Why did it feel important and really significant to so many people?
Ultimately, if you create something that is useful and usable, then I think most people will adopt. Ultimately, whether you're in the private sector or public sector, unfortunately, or in the public sector, it's. It's really difficult to get those two qualities because government is just a beast with so many silos. So to make something useful and usable, you need to normally have that horizontal type lens rather than the. All these vertical silos. And that's why it's really, really hard inside a government. But I think if you deliver that, people have shown en masse and pretty quickly, mind you, obviously Covid accelerated the journey because we then introduced more useful and usable lines, product lines in the service app that people will adopt. So Australians, but definitely in New South Wales as a test bed, show that we are early adopters. If you got the right product and.
We can see the utility, the gains. Like I think anyone our age could still remember the rta. The rta. There's even a great part in one of the Pixel films, you know the one I'm talking about, right. Where they show how terribly slow and drawn out that process was for people. You had to allocate a couple of hours to go to the rta.
I remember Gladys Berejiklian, who, you know, I owe a lot of credit to because things don't happen without leadership. And I had her leadership. So she gave me the air cover I needed to go crazy. So it wasn't Glad a lot of this wouldn't have happened. But I remember Glad telling me a story early on in the piece where she. She would literally take a book to the RTA because she knows that she was going to be there for a few hours.
Hours. Yeah. Yeah.
I would literally have to take the morning off work to go and renew myself. Like, it was crazy.
Everybody would remember that.
You would factor that in. Yeah, I've got to go to the rta. There's a half the day gone.
Yeah. And also a lot of people got really disgruntled. So I often thought about what it was like for the staff and the RTA just having irritated people in front of them.
It's not great for staff, it's not great for anybody. It's not great for the people. The RTA was so visionary at the time. They. They had the perspective screens before COVID you know, they were training us for Covid, you see, with all the perspective screens and Form 1Q. But you look at the modern service Centers now, there's no perspective screens. People come in and even if they are upset or frustrated, the CSAT scores show that when they come out, they come out with smile effects. In fact, on the service centers, last time I checked, it was like 98% thumbs up. Like, crazy good for government. It's been huge crazy good for government.
And now you're outside of the public service, you're in a very different season of your life and career, but you're still really engaged, as I know you, with ideas around systems and reducing friction and actually bringing more dignity and compassion into the system. So tell us a bit, like, what does a week in your life look like now? And what are you most focused on after your political career?
Well, look, I've been blessed. I believe that there's that parable in the Bible that says the widow with talents, like the widow puts two coins in the tray and then you got the wealthy person at the front putting a million dollars in the tray. And me personally, how come I didn't get them? Well, because I gave you so much opportunity and this is all you give back, that I didn't give her anything and she gave more than that. Right. So I feel like I have been blessed with so much opportunity in my life. I've got a lot more I've got to give back before I sort of, you know, try and knock on the door to Pearly Gates. So what I'm trying to do is think, all right, well, with all these opportunities I got through, particularly my journey in New South Wales, in the, in the government there for 12 years, how do I bottle that up and then create knowledge or share that community or knowledge? The best way to do that is through building a global community and then we can start sharing best practices so we can help governments evolve from a 2.0, which is a government G2, which is very silo driven, to a government 3.0, which is the stuff that you and I were just talking about, which is human driven and put the human at the center, get rid of all the dross and the noise, don't worry about the silos. We don't need to know about that. We just need to make sure that you get your services really fast, really efficient, really safe, so you can get on with your life. You don't need government in your life.
That's the thinking better for everyone. So with the idea of that human at the center, tell me a little bit about that sense of, you know, I've had a life with so much opportunity. What are some of the kind of aspects of that tell us a little bit about what opportunity has looked like for you.
Somebody once said to me, the harder you work, the luckier you get. But some things you just. Doors just open up. I never wanted to be a politician in the sense that when Gladys asked me to run for parliament, I said no.
I actually what you're doing at that.
Stage, I was a lawyer, I was a part of law firm and I was just starting to. Now you get to a certain threshold where you actually seen the same case a thousand times before. So you know your stuff, right? And it's not like you can take a breather, but you can actually be more strategic than in your thought rather than just working like a machine. And I got to that point thinking, okay, I sort of know my stuff now.
Catch your breath.
Yeah, catch my breath. And then I said, oh, no time for you to go back into the machine and start working like a crazy person again. So I said no. But then my mom, because my dad passed away when I was 30, a tragic accident. My mum never remarried. She's just mum and dad, soul mates. So my mum and my two sisters said, look, you should do it. In fact, it was a. It was a 2:1 vote to the family vote. It was a 2:1 vote. My Earth angel sister, who's the primary carer for my mum now, she said, don't do it like we'll never see you again. Politics are full of idiots. You know, you've got a good reputation now, you work hard, you've earned all this. Why would you throw all this away to go into it assessed pit of politics? But my other sister said, do it. And then my mum said, your dad be proud. So that was a clincher for me.
Was there anyone outside the family that you kind of. Oh, well, I had to got counsel from obviously Gladys, but I'm thinking others.
Yeah, Gladys. I had a few other people, like my partner and my law firm at the time was saying, what, you're going to leave me on the lurch here? Like so, you know, I had. That's why I thought, look, I'll just put it to the family vote because I had competing interests as to whether I do or not. But these opportunities, when I said that was an extraordinary opportunity and it was a gift. And then I got elected in and I had no idea what it was like to be a minister. I remember Barry o', Farrell, who was the premier at the time, he said to me, you know, if you were to be a minister, what would it be? And I thought, oh, geez, I don't know anything about being a minister. Like, just give me something stuff I know, like multiculturalism. So I sort of know that I can do volunteering. I can do that, you know, I can't. I can't wreck up.
You didn't go in with, like, a ministerial agenda saying, I want to lead digital transformation.
I didn't go in with a representative agenda. I didn't. Why I was. I. I wanted to be a lawyer, but they said, look, there's an opportunity to make profound change inside of Parliament and government. I was in opposition for two and a half years, but then when Barry gave the ministries out, I was fortunate enough to get one. And you also threw in Aboriginal affairs, and I had no understanding at all. But what that taught me, particularly the first four years when I was a minister, there was how to listen, because I knew. I knew nothing. And the Aboriginal community was so good to me. Shizo was so good to me. They must have known I was a greenhorn, but they literally held my hand. They really showed me the power of storytelling as well. I learned so much in those first four years. Then the next four years, happenstance. I got innovation and better egg. And then last four years, Covid, and I was there, like, all these sliding door moments, opportunities that I didn't curate. Yeah, they just happened. I mean, I just happened to be there.
Just like the serendipity of life it.
Is, you know, So I guess I took those opportunities. Yeah.
I think you have a reputation, certainly when you were in politics, for having that fresh perspective, a lot of that courage, and that listening ear. And I can imagine that would have been really refreshing for the community as well, because there are a lot of great politicians that bring those traits, but there are some that don't.
Yeah.
And so regardless of whether you had deep knowledge in the portfolios you were leading, you were there to listen and learn. That would have meant so much to the people that were in front of you.
So I'm still learning now.
Yeah, we all are.
I wake up every day, like, I realize how little I do know. You know, I just think the great source of leadership, for successful leadership, is to surround yourself with people far better than you, and that's.
And ask great questions. Because knowledge is not the end game anymore.
No, it's. It's the ability to. The most important muscle in the AI age is your deltoid. Put your hand up, ask the question. Because if you're not asking questions, then you're left behind.
Yeah, we'll come Back to that conversation around digital and. And curiosity. But I wanted to talk to you a little bit on a more personal level because you've been speaking publicly more recently about your mum and her. She's living with dementia. We did a piece on Channel nine together a couple of weeks ago. I wanted to ask you as her son, what has been one moment in the process of your mum's journey that has really shows us what it was like for you as her son?
Oh, wow, there's so many. Maybe. Can I preface all this? Like, the only reason that we went public about this was, again, it wasn't through my courage or. Or anything, it was through my sisters. What happened was because it's so deeply private and I feel. I really feel that you obviously approached and I respect so much the work you're doing. And my mom's specialist also reached out and said about the same time, look, you know, we need to put some public awareness around this and your mom would be a great candidate for that public awareness. And I've resisted up until that point because I could have talked about this six years ago, I could have spoken about it in Parliament.
And you've often shared little anecdotes about your mum and maybe your LinkedIn posts and whatnot, but you've never really.
No, because I feel so. Yeah, I feel so guarded for her privacy and. And she's not in a position where she can voluntarily release that privacy. So I'm. But then when I again spoke to my sisters and they're amazing people, and I said straight off the bat, look, it's great for public awareness, it's for the greater. Mum would have appreciated this. So that's why we're talking about it. So. Oh, look, during those, particularly last four or five years, I'd go to Mum's place religiously and we do cooking together. Mum is a phenomenal cook. A phenomenal cook. You know, she could put a brick in between two pieces of bread and still taste good. Right? Like, she's amazing. She would never want me in the kitchen when I was a kid, like, because I'm in control of the kitchen in a very gentle, beautiful way. But, no, you go and study. Let me do this. One of the many love languages was food. But through her dementia journey, she invited me into the kitchen more because she needed more help as well. So we started cooking more together. Initially, I would just do the preparation and Mum would do the cooking. And then. And then I'd start doing the cooking as well with her. And then towards the end, Mum would just do the preparation. And so, you know, that journey. And in many ways, like, I did a social media post every Sunday, but for me it was a catalog of a journey for four or five years of that beautiful bond that we've got.
Through food and still giving her agency in her own kitchen and a sense of purpose.
She's always in control and absolute purpose.
Because they say a lot, you know, in terms of loving for and caring for someone with dementia, it's really important to still give them choices, even if it's just a choice of one or two ingredients or outfits or whatever. But don't take the choices away.
Yes. And I.
We go together.
I say, mum, what do you want to do? You're into this or that, and. But Mum would always say, what would you like to do, son? So what about this? Okay. Yeah, so. But the point is, it was a dialogue and, you know, it was a precious, precious time.
And I know it's been really hard on your sisters, too.
This Catherine in particular is just extraordinary. Yeah.
It must have been hard for you to, given your dad died when you were 30, so you've been the only male in. In that family. I mean that. The eldest of three and the only son. That adds other dynamics too, doesn't it?
Sure. But I'm easy in the sense that my journey's been nothing compared to, like, Catherine, you know, look at her, she's a nurse angel. Like, she looked after Mum for a year. She's a primary school teacher. She gave up her job. She's doing, you know, emergency foster care. She's got beautiful kids and amazing husband. Like, you know, I can't imagine putting myself in her shoes and the stress and. And the burden on her should. I've got an easy life compared to her.
Yeah.
So, you know, I respect where it's due.
That juggle, that strain, it's just extraordinary. It is, like, huge. And it's becoming so common, but it's so silent on so many levels.
Superhuman.
What do you think is the hardest thing for the family in terms of, you know, the emotional side of this, the practical side of it, or the kind of constant decision making? What's been some of the toughest things, Navigating it.
I'm reasonably well versed with government and forms. Don't get me started on forms.
But we might come back to that.
You know, that a crusade against these damn things and how to streamline processes. So I'm used to all the frustration. But when you are in, you know, the boiler room, it's very Different. I'm really busy as well with a million things going on in my life and Catherine Marie, but they've got, everyone's got a million things going on in their lives. But when someone said we got to do this, well, what do we do? Like there's no one stop shop like service, New South Wales top approach, one stop shop to guide you through. That's really overwhelming. And you know what happens is you, you say to your family, what do we do next? What do we do next? So you go and explore that. You go and explore that. You. It is, it's really bad. It's really bad.
And all of that kind of sad men as we call it, that kind of overwhelming bureaucracy is happening at a point in time where you're emotionally overwhelmed too. You're dealing with health changes or decline of someone that you love. You're not just waking up on a Monday morning and leisurely going to, you know, fill out a, a form that has no real meaning. It's happening at a point in time where there's just this real smash up of all of the emotional and practical. And then things keep changing, don't they? It's, you know.
Oh, constantly changing.
You're constantly having to navigate and advocate.
Yeah. And constantly changing in, you know, in my mum's journey, like her personal journey is constantly changing, let alone our worlds. And then you're going to have to update forms and, and to be honest, it gets to a point where it's just too hard. So you just think, I'll just leave that to the end, you know, well, let's spend quality time with mum. Right. That's the quality time we'll get to the forms and everything else, you know, that becomes second, third, fourth order priority. But you quickly realize that without that support in place, you know, looking after some quality time with mum gets harder as well. Right. So it's a double whammy. It's a pressure cooker. If that was working seamlessly, then that would enable this ordinarily difficult challenge in our lives to be a bit smoother.
And decisions that little bit easier.
Well, yes, yes.
I mean that what you've just described there is the common state and I talk about the, this idea of just too little, too late because that too hard basket that you just pointed to is so real for people and they just don't have the bandwidth, the emotional energy, the practical energy to work through a lot of that stuff. So they just don't.
Yeah.
And then they arrive at decisions and they don't have a sense of what is important. They don't have all the inputs, they don't have the family members on the same page. And that's when things start to get really hard.
And like Musa, I used to be a litigation lawyer, so I know how to read a document. I. I used to pass move laws in Parliament. I know about laws. Right. And I struggled, really struggled. Imagine somebody that doesn't have English as a first language, or somebody that doesn't have a supporting, loving family around them because, you know, things are fracturing. Like if I found it hard, it is unconscionable what other people would be going through.
That's so true. And that's why we're looking at 11% of people having a power of attorney, 86% of people having no kind of plan in place for this because it's too hard in its current form and it's going in that too hard basket. People don't know where to start. When we think about dementia, it's the second leading cause of death in Australia. I thought that I read that last week. What's Dementia Action Week this week? So there's lots of going on around that, but it is definitely the leading cause of death for women. And I'm curious, you know, from your experience, what makes it such a uniquely difficult condition for families to face?
Well, I think the burden is obviously with dementia that the person going through dementia, they, they go through a lot of decline. But for the families, it's like a long goodbye. It's not like it's static. You go through Plato, drop, plateau drop, bladder drop, and every drop you feel like it's another goodbye that you're not getting back.
It's grief.
Yeah, it's constant grief. Like I went through, you know, profound grief with my dad, but that was just intense shock. But this is very long and yeah, very. It's very challenging.
The other kind of paradox that I see in dementia is early in someone's diagnosis, nobody really wants to talk about decline. You know, you want to think about how well mum is today. So trying to have conversations around her future care, her preferences, when her cognitive ability will be a lot less. It's so hard to do those in the early stages with Mum.
Like there is. Mum is fiercely independent and she would never wanted to go into a home, never. And we never want to her to end up there. But the reality is you get to a point where you need 24, 7 care.
Yeah, it's the right place at the right time.
It's the right place, right time. And you know, we never wanted that to happen. But again, she needed proper professional care at that point. We'd still go and visit every day, but. But still, if when we had those discussions at the beginning, Mum was saying, no, I don't, I'll be okay, I'll be okay, she'd be in denial initially, I don't have dementia. I don't have dementia. They've got dementia. I don't have dementia. And then we point out little things, say, mum, oh, look, you know, you forgot to turn the stove off or something like that. Yeah, I think it's time to move in with Catherine. I don't want to move in with Catherine. Why don't you just go and help Catherine out? Catherine needs a hand to look after the kids. Oh, okay, I'll do that. And then so we graduated that way. But the real hard part, once it was, then transitioning into a home like that was really, really hard. And there's a small window where I think you can do it.
Did your mum go through respite first before she went into.
No, what we did, we went like all the nursing homes we went to were very good, but it's just the timing. Like the first time we went again, my sisters stayed overnight with her. She had slept in the room, they did the room up. But Mum was still aware enough to know this is not my place, like, why am I here? Type thing. And that was just crushing for us because we feel like we've let her down and we've abandoned her. And no one wants to do that because she's done so much for us. Like, we can't give enough back for mum. So Catherine said, no, I can't leave mum here. She's. She's still too aware. And then tried again and then still no. And then the third time, by that stage, Mum was dementia had evolved to a point where she wasn't as distressed. Moving in, she's not constantly saying, I need to go home, I need to go home. This is now her home and she's adopted that. And finding that that place was really hard.
But we got, what a place of, like, grief and relief at the same time. Because, you know, your mum now has that round the clock care that she needs, but to get there.
Oh, that was tough. Yeah, that was tough. Yeah. No, we hated it.
Do you see having gone through that and kind of putting your former political hat on, do you see points in the system where people are at most risk of falling through the cracks?
Yeah. Again, governments, when they work well in their silo in their domains, like if you've just got an health issue. Generally, government, particularly in Australia and most advanced countries, they provide pretty good services in the scary things. Right. But that's in the silo. But when we need to go and join up services such as the stuff that we're talking about here, where it's not just one department looking after you 24 7, it's, you know, you need to go this department and then you need to fill out that form and that department, then you've got to go over here and you and I will make the jump between the various verticals. We won't like it, it'll be painful, it'll be traumatic, but we will make the jump. But if you're vulnerable, you're not going to make the jump and you'll fall between the cracks and it gets worse and worse. And a lot of people, for example, find themselves in a homeless situation. That's a typical example of people falling between the cracks. Right. So typically you have a job, love your job, you've been there for 30 years, you lose your job because of change, then all of a sudden you can't cope, you can't find another job, so you get onto substance abuse, then you abuse your partner, then you end up in jail, and then you're not treated well there, and then you're on the street because, you know, you lost your family, then you're homeless. Right. So that equals employment, industrial relations at the beginning, intersection with the court, intersection with detention, crime. Then you've got NGOs asking you questions all the time, like, these are people literally falling between the cracks at every critical point.
And also, you know, those people are just suffering so much emotionally, the way that their life has been upended, taken that path. Yeah, there's a lot of shame, there's a lot of regret. That's it's such a painful place. So they're not in a place where they've got any kind of resilience.
Correct.
To kind of address the things the system needs from them.
Correct. So the system is not designed to look after that horizontal journey, because I think if it did, then you would stop a lot of the trauma at the top of the river rather than.
You know, when people are in. Yeah, I mean, it's actually a great parallel to this whole chapter of life. If we had a way to have conversations when, you know, we might turn 50 or 60 or certainly 75, you know, we still may live another 20 years, but we start to recognize that we are moving into a different phase of our lives. And we need to talk with our families, the people that care for us, around what matters to us, what our values and preferences are, to do some of that joining up that you're talking about and think about the dignity and the preparation and the support that, that can anchor everybody through that. And I've heard you talk a lot about life transitions and that, that's immediately what I'm thinking about.
It's a massive life transition and it's part of life. You know, there's no avoiding it. You're going to go through not one.
In five, not one in ten.
That's right. It is a life transition. There's, you know, there's some big life events that people go through. This is one of them.
How much do you think technology has got a role to play in that massive role?
I'm a bit of a, you know, tech junkie, but not because, you know, I like my toys. It's far from it. I just want to reduce suffering, but in a big way and improve quality of life on the other side of that coin. So, you know, how do you reduce suffering? Well, we can all get on our knees and pray for a miracle. All of us, the APN or whatever we are in the world now, get on our knees, pray for a miracle and let the blind see, the deaf hear and the lame to walk right. But it's not going to happen. But if we use tech responsibly, we will get modern miracles. And it's not just in terms of cochlear or stuff they're doing in relation to robotic vision now. It's crazy how it is wild and it's going to continue to improve, but it's also in, in terms of service delivery, how do we use tech and platforms to synthesize all this mess and noise to make it work?
It feels like a really important moment in time because, you know, there are incredible services out there. There are, there are incredible people doing on the ground work. And we could sit here and tell ourselves that one day we'll have enough money and have enough kind of energy in the system to put a person in front of another person and solve that, but that is never going to happen. So when do we kind of flip the script on that?
And also that one day might be hypothetically, 10, 20 years, look at all the people that are going to suffer between that time.
It's a lot closer than that. When we, when we look at the demographic shift, that's the thing that I'm really kind of reckoning with. In the conversations that I'm having, we, we can't push today, a social worker, a palliative care, like, we just don't have those resources here. So how are we going to address that gap and how opportune is this moment for tech to help us with that and increase access, increase outcomes and do it at a, you know, cost that we can actually afford?
Yeah, well, the service model I think, shows that you can do that. You know, we've always got the physical service centers. There's always going to be a place for the human in the loop, as it were. But not everyone needs that. You know, a lot of people would rather go, click, click on the phone.
Get out of my way at 10:00 clock at night.
Yeah, 10:00 clock at night. You know, you do you. Or actually I, you know, pick up the phone and talk to somebody. Like there's multiple channels. But I think most people, most people would say, look, give me the fastest, easiest, safest way to do it. Because if I need to see someone, I've got to physically get up, I've got to get into my car, I've got to walk there. It takes time and sometimes, you know, time is the most precious thing. So you think, I need that help right now, quick.
It also means that, that human service delivery can be really focused on where it is needed most.
Spot on.
Yeah, that's critical. Particularly again, when we think about this life stage. I'm really keen to understand your views on like, equity and technology. So how do we think about tech in a way that people still feel seen and heard and cared for and how do we think about it in terms of different levels of education and tech literacy and even diverse cultural needs? How do you think about that?
Yeah, so I, one of my, you know, I made a lot of mistakes in my life, but one of the big wake up calls for me again, using my mum as an example, was when I was ministering and we were rolling out those Covid vouchers. Right. And. But also the QR chickens. And I remember, like, I was just so determined to get as many people onto the platform as we could because at the time, no one knew what was going to happen. We were worried, was this going to mutate up into the brain?
Like a terrifying time.
It was a terrifying time. No one wanted to go to school.
Yeah.
Bit of a hindsight. Oh, yeah. We know we should never have done this student. At the time, everyone was saying, I'm not even going to take my kids to school. We don't know what this is going to do, we'd say, you know, you can't go to a venue now unless you check in pen and paper, blah, blah, blah. That was massive privacy concerns. But privacy just went out the window. But not just privacy concerns, like, you know, security concerns, like we were hearing people, you know, a lady would be writing her name and phone number and address for contact tracing and then somebody behind would just be taking a photocopy, right?
And it doesn't give you any data. There's nothing that you can use in real time.
No. You know, somebody was going to have to digest a double entry. It was. It was just crazy. It was just not fit for purpose. So. And then people said, well, we'll download apps. We can download your own app. Every time you go to a new venue, I'm gonna put in, you know, and that was cocky. So when things become really clunky and awkward, people, not everyone, a lot will say, look, my name is Mickey Mouse. You know, a couple of zeros, like, yeah, just get me into the door, right? And you just need one person and the system code contract, tracing collapses. So I said, no, we'll go through the service app, we'll make it. You just tell us once and bang, click, click, click. You don't have to download every damn form ever again. And that took off. And I remember Mum saying to me one day, she said, oh, son, can you help me download the qr? You know, checking code on the app? Of course, Mum, I'm the Minister for Innovation. I'm Minister for Digital.
Let me help you with that, Mom.
I sort of know a little bit about this and I was so embarrassed. What's up? Because I looked at Mum's phone and it was so old, right, it couldn't even download the operating system, so she couldn't even get the QR reader. I thought, you bloody idiot. You know, you've left behind some of the most vulnerable people that we're trying to protect, including your mum. You've left them by. You haven't designed for that. Whereas most people could have gone and got on their phone and got on really fast, there was a cohort of people that I neglected. I can still remember the time looking in the ceiling thinking, you idiot. So what we did, we reversed engineered that and then we said, well, what we'll do, service will give you a QR code in the form of a QR card. And then every time you go to Woolworths or Coles, they can get you. So they got the data, so they can then feed it into the system. Right. So we reversed engineered that experience. But the point is it just taught me you can use tech in that situation to be inclusive. But the biggest lesson for me is it has to be part of the design. It should never be part of a bolt on. So when you're designing tech, you know, inclusion has to be a design element.
I think that's fundamental. But I'm also just so aware of the pace that you must all have been working at and you can't let progress get in the way of perfection that we know we all want. You had a real need to meet.
True.
So I can kind of see it on your face and that must have been a horrible moment when you realize that. But you know, the flip side is you did make that available to.
We were millions of people, miles an hour. We're building and flying the planes.
Get much sleep in that chapter of your life?
No, because then I was, you know, I was doing a lot of research at the time as to what Singapore and Korea, Vietnam, because they went through SARS and mers. I was looking at what their trends were doing. So I was getting a lot of insights from there. So. But look, we got there in the.
End and we all know what a QR code is now, whereas we know what a QR code is most didn't. It was some kind of novel strange.
It was a scratch thing pre Covid. But hey, it's got a lot of.
Utility now, hasn't it? Coming up next, Victor talks about the shift to Government 3.0, how services can better connect around life events. The digital progress that's really giving him hope, what he's seeing in other parts of of the world and making sure that no one is left behind. A big part of what we talk about on age hood is the juggling act, you know, the people. Sounds a lot like your sister and you and your other sister, how you balance all of this as your parents age and as their health needs change and you may be raising kids and you've got your work and everything else in the middle. But one thing that we don't talk about enough and I know you and I have talked about is productivity. Because caring for a loved one, it's not just emotional. It really reshapes work and careers and livelihoods. And I'm just keen to understand, you know, from what you've seen and what you've experienced, how does this affect people's productivities? What does it mean for career progression and financial security?
Oh, look again. Look at my sister like she's literally given up her job as a teacher to look after my mum as a full time carer. She's now, we're now into that next phase where she's now getting back into the workforce. But that took a while to do that. So that whole transition, you know, was about a year or two. And that's painful emotionally, financially.
Confidence really takes a knock in, in a, in an experience like that. You know, you've gone through a huge journey as a carer and then you kind of trying to get back into the world.
Yeah, that's why these carers are superheroes in my books. And then like, for me, I'm not married, don't have kids, so I'm married to, literally married to my work, which is not healthy. But you know, I've got a very tough partner in that sense. But mum is a huge priority for me. So, you know, I'm the minimum two days a week and yeah, I'll leave it three o', clock, spend time with mum and get home by about 7:30, something like that. But you know, if I wasn't doing that, I'd be more productive at work. Right. So yeah, it does take a big toll. And then there's all the other time that you're spending worrying and you know, looking for solutions and you know, trying to find out what the best thing to do is. And you know, that takes time, mental.
Effort as well as like actual time, doesn't it?
It's emotionally, mentally exhausting. So then you've got to shift into the brain to say, all right, well now I'm focused back on work again. So yeah, it is really, really tough.
And it feels like we're only just beginning or we have begun to make some good progress around parenting, you know, around how you really support parents, having children, raising young children in the workplace. But this idea of parenting now where you're caring for your parents, I wonder what take for, you know, workplaces to really start to think about how they're going to support their midlifers who are going to be managing that exact experience in huge volumes within five years, like millions. It's projected to be the combined populations of Adelaide and Perth, you know, and 70% of that will be women. There'll be millions of Australians dealing with this. What do you think should be on the minds of those big systems and workplaces?
Well, as you said, like, you know, there is a demand for talent at the moment. We're all scratch around for talent. If workplaces don't accommodate this, then the talent will go to a place that does.
It does.
The fire is not on the toes yet, but I think the fire is going to come up and start coming underneath us really soon. As you say, like there is a proverbial tsunami coming in terms of percentages. Unless something dramatic happens, like, well, there's going to be one of two outcomes. People are either going to be left to their own devices and really, really suffer though. I. E. The. The people with dementia and their journey is not supported in a beautiful, caring way.
Yeah.
Which is just heartbreaking. Or the care is going to take a lot of load and then go over there and then there's not going to be the productivity in the workforce. So there's going to have to be some give. I'm sorry, there's just going to have to be a reckoning at some point. Pretty quickly, I would have thought so.
We just ran some research on this exact question and about 90% of people who are currently caring for someone or anticipate that they will be, they're feeling really overwhelmed.
Yep.
Really unprepared. Really quite worried about what this chapter of life is going to look like and how they're going to keep all those plates spinning.
Yeah, it's hard. Everybody thinks they're invincible, everybody thinks they're going to live forever and nothing's ever going to happen to them. But the reality is it's going to impact a lot of people.
A lot of workplaces, particularly those industries that are heavily female led, you think about teaching or nursing or even aged care, healthcare, high proportions of female workforce.
Yeah. And if you take them out and then again that then goes to the diversity issue as well. Like, you know, in the tech sector in particular. The tech sector has a major challenge in relation to getting more women in there because women equals diversity. Women and a whole lot of other things equal diversity. So if you take women out, that's 50%, like that's crazy. In a sector that needs it more.
Just that downward pressure on productivity, on the economy as well as that pain that's going to be experienced in a lot of families with interruptions to earning capacity and longer term financial sustainability. Yeah, I think it's really worrying.
Yeah, it's a real blunt chop. It's going to be very choppy next five, ten years for sure.
Tell us a little bit about government 3.0 because, you know, we've talked about it, but I'm not sure it's a term that many listeners would be too familiar with. And I've been really fascinated around your. The Way you weave this story together around life transitions and what people need through the lens of Government 3.0 Connecting services around life events. Well, okay, it was a bit of a 101.
Okay, 101 or government zero is paper government. This is, you know, full of forms, full of silos, you know, tell us, not once tell us 100 times, but generally in paper channels. A big meteor hit the planet in 1990, was called the Internet. And it forced every government to go from government zero to government 1.0 or G1. And they went from paper form to web form, but still in silos. Then 15 years later, in 2005, another big meteor hit the planet. Social media, smartphones. Right. And it forced every government around the world to go from G1 to G2. So we were interactive government at that point. So we're still in silos, digital channels and paper channels. But at least now we were starting to get some feedback on the phone. Thumbs up, thumbs down, social media, bit of feedback, don't like your services, try and improve here or there. Fifteen years later, another meteor hit the planet. And again, when I say meteors, they hit every government. So like it was just bespoke to New Zealand or it's just happened up in Canada. Every government around the world had these challenges and that was called Covid. It forced every government to start thinking G2 is not going to cut it anymore. These silos, these digital things are pretty cool. But we're not going to get through Covid unless we start connecting services. So a lot of governments started putting their toe in the water of what G3 could look like. You know, connected government. G3 meant, for example, you know, with the service app. If we didn't have a G3 architecture, what would have happened is the border pass would have been done by transportation. They would have issued you with app. A QR check in would have been done by police, they would have issued a police app. The vaccine certificates would have been issued by Health Health app. The time discovered vouchers would have been issued by Treasury. A Treasury app, like, you get the point. Like there would have been five or six different apps, different times. You have to complete and identify yourself. All these things that would have taken time. People would have seen.
People just would have dropped out people too much.
You're never going to get the adoption rates or the satisfaction score scores. So people started thinking, okay, this works. And then AI started really coming over the top of that. But what's happened, Melissa, is that most governments went from G3. The crisis is over. Now we'll go back to G2 because the change between G0 and G1 is a tick change. G1 to G2 tech change G2 to G3. The tech exists. It's a culture change and it's a mindset. It's a mindset.
When you describe, I'm thinking about like the one front door. That's how I'm making sense of G3. Is that. Is that a reasonable way to think about it?
We could have done that with the tech.
Yes, yes.
Social media was doing that. Right. One front door. But that's a culture change or mindset change. That's hard. So, you know, that's what the Future Government Institute is about. Like, how do we get more from G2 to G3? Because then we've got to start preparing for the next big meteor that's going to hit the planet in another 15 years time. So 2035, everyone is going to have. If you've got a smartphone, you're going to have a Jarvis on your phone, you know, or in your glasses or on your ears or with the humanoid robotics coming out. And literally a Jarvis that's going to be in your home, right? You're going to have 6G communications, you're going to have some form of AGI, however you want to describe it. We'll probably be at the beginning of some enterprise level of quantum by that point. You know, it's going to be a very augmented world. It's not just going to be physical, physical. We're going to have Jiminy the Cricket and people talk, you know, bots talking, Aries. It's really going to be augmented, fundamentally different to where we are today. That's intelligent government, that's G4. We need new trust architecture for that and infrastructure for that. What does that look like? But most governments are squandering opportunities in G2 land and all this trauma is happening because they can't get to G3, let alone to G4.
Do you think governments can do this work? What is the way that that may happen?
Yeah, but through example. So again, service New South Wales was an example. Was the whole government fixed? No, but you know, your pockets are really good here and there. And generally when I go to government, so I do a lot of travel these days, I see a lot of good pockets here and there coming out. But generally the maturity levels are in the G2 space. But you get places like Singapore that have been really pushing that G3, what's.
Some of the best stuff? Tell us about the best things that you're seeing to give you that.
Singapore. You know, the easiest part is if you get in the plane, you go to Singapore, it's passport less, not that.
Nasty little card that you have to fill out with a pencil in the dinosaur that.
Yeah, that's right. It's embarrassing. It's. It's just crazy stuff. A country as good as or great as Australia is, I wouldn't have thought.
That would have been the hardest thing to innovate either.
It's not.
No, it's interesting, isn't it? Because it's. It is such a pain point done.
A lot of times. Like, we would be one of the few countries I would have left definitely in the oecd. Having said that, I went to Egypt the other day and I had to fill out a form, so I. But, you know, that's the land of the pyramid, so they love antiquity.
We don't really have that excuse. Maybe that's another conversation.
So. But, you know, New Zealand's got some people say, oh, biosecurity risk. Well, go across the ditch. I've got a little thing called the Kiwi over there. They've got to be very precious about their biosecurity as well. They've managed to do it like. It's got nothing to do with tech, it's all to do with culture and mindset, as you said. But in Singapore, they're moving ahead to passportless. Abu Dhabi is doing the same. Dubai. Then again, you go into the Nordic areas like Estonia and Finland and Denmark, and even there's pockets in the uk. Yeah, there's pockets here and there. But the big exemplars that I've seen that are moving really fast towards that G3 is, you know, Singapore, Finland, Estonia, that area, and the Middle east, they're moving really fast. And even Asia, parts of Asia, they're really moving fast.
So what's the most exciting thing you've come across in those travels that really demonstrates that G3 that tells once approach.
Where government, rather than being reactive, can be proactive. So rather than getting an ambulance for you as you fall off the cliff, they're giving you support so you don't fall off the cliff. If we want to reduce suffering, that's how you do it. You don't do it by holding somebody's.
Hand and breaking, pulling them out of the river. Yeah.
That's not reducing suffering. So that's how we. We need to evolve and fast.
If you could pick one or two challenges when you think about Australia, the shape of our aging population, the kind of volume and the velocity that this is coming at us. And you could think about one or two things that would make the biggest difference for families. What do you think they would be?
Yeah, again I keep coming back to that service approach because it, because it works. It's demonstrably working. That telus once approach, that one stop shop people don't need all this noise in their life and forms is just noise, it's traumatic, it's piercing. So you know, how do we reduce that so that we have in the very precious time we've got put as much of that precious time, quality time with loved ones and yourself caring for yourself, giving you time to grieve and breathe rather than these richer damn processes that a. It's too hard to navigate. So if we that tell us once approach I think would take a lot.
Of burden away from that makes so much sense to me. I, I think a lot around. You know when my husband died and I had to take his death certificate and this is pre service New South Wales so probably would be better today but I had to put that certificate on the counter in front of so many strangers who then looked at it and figured out that this had happened to me and to my family. And then you know, you, you just feel exposed, you feel tired and sad again. You're trying to manage their emotion. It's like I just need to put this in the cloud somewhere and tell you it is just take me out of this thing. That kind of joined up thinking doesn't seem that hard.
It's doable.
Yeah, it's totally doable.
In fact, if I was still there now I'm glad I'm out. But if I was still there, I'll never go back.
I was wondering if you got to mention that you.
I'm glad I'm there, I'm glad I'm out. Never go back. But I'm super grateful. The opportunity. But if I was there, the road map that was planned out was digitize the birth certificate, digitize the marriage certificate, digitize the destin to be. You know, all these things like because we can do it. These are essentially credentials, you know, we can digitize and make them verifiable to source. Then all of a sudden that journey.
That you just disappeared pretty much. And you've saved hours, hours for the insurer, the bank, like all the people looking for that source of truth, you've just taken all the work off them as well. It's.
It's so much like I wouldn't even know like for my Personal. I wouldn't even know where it is. I applied for it recently. You know all these paper certificates, like they're meaningless these days because you can fabricate them so quickly.
Yeah.
So governments are going to get there eventually. It's a question of how long it's going to take them.
Well, let's, let's hope we can put some impetus behind that. I'm trying pretty quickly agitating as much as I can back on a personal level, what has this journey with your mum taught you about what really matters?
Oh, what really matters is time. I'm here constantly thinking about this. I'm here as a speck in space and time, but the speck of time I've got on this journey is so precious. So how much of that time can I spend with my mum and quality people in my life and how do I reduce the noise?
Yeah. And you also, I think you talked about other aspects of that just around recognizing that opportunity came your way and how do you give that opportunity?
I got lucky. So that, so there's quality time with mum and then there's quality time in work. And that's the other thing I learned as a minister. When you're so busy, it's so easy to get on the treadmill and just go, go, go, go, go. But you need to give yourself time. And I think leaders need to sort of just literally pencil in some time during the day to think, to process. Where are the big levers I can pull here? Because otherwise I'm just going to be lost in the weeds and nothing gets done.
Yeah. The busyness doesn't equal output.
No. Or impact. Positive.
Yeah.
If you want really positive impact, you're going to have to give yourself time to think about it and give yourself that license.
And for families who might just be beginning this journey caring for a loved one with dementia, what would you want them to hear from you?
There are better ways. Like again, I've been blessed. I've got two sisters, I've got a mum that, you know, we're very close knit family. So we came together. So very, very blessed. But you know, for families going through this journey, definitely reach out and ask for help. My sister put it perfectly with Violet. You know, when Catherine spoke to you, the first thing she said to me after she spoke to you, I wish I spoke to Melissa five years ago. So, you know, reach out. You don't have to be alone.
That's a lot that we've covered. Thank you. Thank you for taking us to kind of those personal and professional places because I think it's really rare sometimes to hear that level of, of genuine personal reflection from someone who has worked at the top of the system. So I'm really grateful for that. And I know that, you know, listeners will take away not just ideas from this conversation, but, you know, maybe some hope that we can build those systems with more dignity, more compassion, less friction. It's been a real privilege. Thank you for the chat.
I'm building that global community. Trust me, the cavalry's coming.
Thank you to Victor for sharing both his personal story and his very real vision for what needs to change. If today's conversation has resonated with you, remember you don't have to carry this alone. You can find support, resources and guidance@violet.org au we believe that the final chapters of life deserve this same care, the same attention as every other milestone. And really, no one should face this stage of life unprepared or unsupported. And with the launch of Violet's Care Compass just around the corner, we'll be sharing more on how this simple values based tool can start to help you to start those conversations early and make sure your voice and the voice of the person that you you love and care for is heard when it matters most. If you'd like to share your story or send us a question, reach us anytime@podcastiolet.org au and if this episode was helpful, please follow us, leave us a review, and share the episode with someone who might need to hear it too. We'll be back soon with another conversation. Until then, take care of yourself, you and the people that you love, and thanks for listening. This episode of agehood was brought to you by Bilwill Sadmen is an unpleasant, often unexpected burden during times of deep grief and lightening that burden for those closest to you with a letter of wishes from Bill, Will is really an act of love. Help navigate the tangle of passwords, the bank accounts, the bills, and more, all while expressing your personal preferences. Reduce stress for your loved ones, share your values and preserve your voice@billwill.com au.

